1981 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1952 Talbot Baby
To start off, 1981 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 306 kg more than 1952 Talbot Baby.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Cadillac Brougham | 1952 Talbot Baby | |
Make | Cadillac | Talbot |
Model | Brougham | Baby |
Year Released | 1981 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 5032 cc | 2690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1956 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 3130 mm |