1981 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1982 Innocenti Turbo De Tomaso
To start off, 1982 Innocenti Turbo De Tomaso is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1246 kg more than 1982 Innocenti Turbo De Tomaso.
Because 1981 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Innocenti Turbo De Tomaso, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Cadillac Brougham | 1982 Innocenti Turbo De Tomaso | |
| Make | Cadillac | Innocenti |
| Model | Brougham | Turbo De Tomaso |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5032 cc | 993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 71 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1956 kg | 710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 3140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2050 mm |
