1981 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2002 Ford Tonka
To start off, 2002 Ford Tonka is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Tonka is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 654 kg more than 2002 Ford Tonka.
Because 2002 Ford Tonka is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Tonka will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Cadillac Brougham | 2002 Ford Tonka | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Brougham | Tonka |
Year Released | 1981 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5032 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1956 kg | 1302 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 6150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 2370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 4200 mm |