1981 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 530 kg more than 1981 Cadillac Brougham.
Because 2013 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Cadillac Brougham | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | Brougham | Tundra |
Year Released | 1981 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5032 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 376 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1956 kg | 2486 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 5810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 3700 mm |