1981 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1965 Morris Minor
To start off, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Morris Minor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Morris Minor would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1965 Morris Minor. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1965 Morris Minor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 350 kg more than 1965 Morris Minor. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Morris Minor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Morris Minor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Cadillac Cimarron | 1965 Morris Minor | |
Make | Cadillac | Morris |
Model | Cimarron | Minor |
Year Released | 1981 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2190 mm |