1981 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1981 Cadillac Cimarron.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Cadillac Cimarron | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
| Model | Cimarron | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2700 mm |
