1981 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1967 Mercury Comet
To start off, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 3,279 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1967 Mercury Comet. (118 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1967 Mercury Comet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mercury Comet weights approximately 212 kg more than 1981 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 1967 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Cadillac Cimarron | 1967 Mercury Comet | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercury |
Model | Cimarron | Comet |
Year Released | 1981 | 1967 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 3279 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1362 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2950 mm |