1981 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1968 Mazda R-100
To start off, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda R-100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda R-100 would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1968 Mazda R-100. (110 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda R-100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 345 kg more than 1968 Mazda R-100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Mazda R-100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda R-100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Cadillac Cimarron | 1968 Mazda R-100 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Cimarron | R-100 |
Year Released | 1981 | 1968 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1963 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2270 mm |