1981 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1983 Seat Ronda
To start off, 1983 Seat Ronda is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1983 Seat Ronda. (62 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1983 Seat Ronda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 250 kg more than 1983 Seat Ronda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Cadillac Cimarron | 1983 Seat Ronda | |
Make | Cadillac | Seat |
Model | Cimarron | Ronda |
Year Released | 1981 | 1983 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1193 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2460 mm |