1981 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1992 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1992 Ford Falcon is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Falcon (198 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1981 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1981 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Falcon weights approximately 350 kg more than 1981 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Cadillac Cimarron | 1992 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Cimarron | Falcon |
Year Released | 1981 | 1992 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 198 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2800 mm |