1981 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1996 Subaru Outback
To start off, 1996 Subaru Outback is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Subaru Outback (148 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1981 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1981 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Subaru Outback weights approximately 260 kg more than 1981 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Cadillac Cimarron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Cadillac Cimarron | 1996 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Cadillac | Subaru |
Model | Cimarron | Outback |
Year Released | 1981 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 2457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2640 mm |