1981 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2002 TVR T 350
To start off, 2002 TVR T 350 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 3,605 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 TVR T 350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 TVR T 350 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 227 more horse power than 1981 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 TVR T 350 should accelerate faster than 1981 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 90 kg more than 2002 TVR T 350.
Because 2002 TVR T 350 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 TVR T 350. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Cadillac Cimarron | 2002 TVR T 350 | |
| Make | Cadillac | TVR |
| Model | Cimarron | T 350 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 3605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1060 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2370 mm |
