1981 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 159 more horse power than 1981 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1981 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1290 kg more than 1981 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Cadillac Cimarron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Cadillac Cimarron | 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
| Model | Cimarron | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 4392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 282 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 2440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2890 mm |
