1981 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2001 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2001 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 165 kg more than 2001 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 2001 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Cadillac DeVille | 2001 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | DeVille | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1981 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6030 cc | 3933 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 249 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2730 mm |