1981 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 590 kg more than 1981 Cadillac DeVille.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Cadillac DeVille | 2008 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
| Model | DeVille | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6030 cc | 2926 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 176 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 2500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 2200 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2890 mm |
