1981 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2004 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2004 Lincoln LS is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln LS (280 HP) has 151 more horse power than 1981 Chevrolet Blazer. (129 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1981 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 101 kg more than 2004 Lincoln LS.
Because 1981 Chevrolet Blazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Lincoln LS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Chevrolet Blazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lincoln LS (388 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Chevrolet Blazer. (285 Nm). This means 2004 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Chevrolet Blazer | 2004 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lincoln |
Model | Blazer | LS |
Year Released | 1981 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4093 cc | 3933 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 280 HP |
Torque | 285 Nm | 388 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 1729 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2910 mm |