1981 Chevrolet Celebrity vs. 2003 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Chevrolet Celebrity. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Chevrolet Celebrity would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 118 kg more than 1981 Chevrolet Celebrity.
Because 2003 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Chevrolet Celebrity, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Chevrolet Celebrity | 2003 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Celebrity | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 4599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 400 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1362 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2580 mm |
