1981 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2000 Citroen Xanae
To start off, 2000 Citroen Xanae is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 476 kg more than 2000 Citroen Xanae.
Because 1981 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xanae, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Chevrolet Impala | 2000 Citroen Xanae | |
Make | Chevrolet | Citroen |
Model | Impala | Xanae |
Year Released | 1981 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 58 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2550 mm |