1981 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2000 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2000 Honda CR-V is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 110 kg more than 2000 Honda CR-V.
Because 1981 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1981 Chevrolet Impala has automatic transmission and 2000 Honda CR-V has manual transmission. 2000 Honda CR-V will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Chevrolet Impala will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Chevrolet Impala | 2000 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | Impala | CR-V |
Year Released | 1981 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5460 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1745 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2620 mm |