1981 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2004 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Ranger weights approximately 110 kg more than 1981 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Chevrolet Impala. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1981 Chevrolet Impala has automatic transmission and 2004 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2004 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Chevrolet Impala will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Chevrolet Impala | 2004 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Impala | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3790 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5460 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3010 mm |
