1981 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2009 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2009 Smart ForTwo is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Chevrolet Impala | 2009 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Smart |
Model | Impala | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1981 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 83 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 2700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 1870 mm |