1981 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1952 Triumph Mayflower
To start off, 1981 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 3,788 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 525 kg more than 1952 Triumph Mayflower.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Chevrolet Malibu | 1952 Triumph Mayflower | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
| Model | Malibu | Mayflower |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3788 cc | 1247 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 37 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2140 mm |
