1981 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 7,275 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 969 kg more than 1981 Chevrolet Malibu.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Chevrolet Malibu | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Malibu | Econoline |
Year Released | 1981 | 1999 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 7275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 213 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 2445 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3510 mm |