1981 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2004 Ford GT
To start off, 2004 Ford GT is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 5,409 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford GT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford GT weights approximately 44 kg more than 1981 Chevrolet Malibu.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1981 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 2004 Ford GT has manual transmission. 2004 Ford GT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Chevrolet Malibu | 2004 Ford GT | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Malibu | GT |
Year Released | 1981 | 2004 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 5409 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 494 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1130 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2730 mm |