1981 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2004 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2004 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 3,934 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 269 kg more than 1981 Chevrolet Malibu.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Chevrolet Malibu | 2004 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Malibu | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1981 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 3934 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 249 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2760 mm |