1981 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2013 Aston Martin Virage
To start off, 2013 Aston Martin Virage is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 5,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2013 Aston Martin Virage is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Aston Martin Virage weights approximately 310 kg more than 1981 Chevrolet Malibu.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Chevrolet Malibu | 2013 Aston Martin Virage | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Aston Martin |
| Model | Malibu | Virage |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3788 cc | 5900 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 490 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1785 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4703 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2061 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1282 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2740 mm |
