1981 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2000 Lada Samara
To start off, 2000 Lada Samara is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 3,790 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 555 kg more than 2000 Lada Samara.
Because 1981 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada Samara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2000 Lada Samara | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lada |
Model | Monte Carlo | Samara |
Year Released | 1981 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 76 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1545 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2470 mm |