1981 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2010 Mazda Premacy
To start off, 2010 Mazda Premacy is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 3,790 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 90 kg more than 2010 Mazda Premacy.
Because 1981 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda Premacy, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2010 Mazda Premacy | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Monte Carlo | Premacy |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3790 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 99 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1545 kg | 1455 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2680 mm |
