1981 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Chevrolet Suburban. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Chevrolet Suburban would be higher. At 6,210 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Chevrolet Suburban (129 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1981 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1981 Chevrolet Suburban has automatic transmission and 2010 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2010 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Chevrolet Suburban will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Chevrolet Suburban | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Suburban | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6210 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5480 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2490 mm |