1981 Chrysler Cordoba vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 1996 Rover 200 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Chrysler Cordoba. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Chrysler Cordoba would be higher. At 5,193 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Chrysler Cordoba is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1981 Chrysler Cordoba is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Chrysler Cordoba. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1981 Chrysler Cordoba has automatic transmission and 1996 Rover 200 has manual transmission. 1996 Rover 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Chrysler Cordoba will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Chrysler Cordoba | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Chrysler | Rover |
Model | Cordoba | 200 |
Year Released | 1981 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5193 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2510 mm |