1981 Chrysler Cordoba vs. 2002 Dodge Razor
To start off, 2002 Dodge Razor is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Chrysler Cordoba. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Chrysler Cordoba would be higher. At 5,193 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Chrysler Cordoba is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1981 Chrysler Cordoba has automatic transmission and 2002 Dodge Razor has manual transmission. 2002 Dodge Razor will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Chrysler Cordoba will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Chrysler Cordoba | 2002 Dodge Razor | |
Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
Model | Cordoba | Razor |
Year Released | 1981 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5193 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 251 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2500 mm |