1981 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1963 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1981 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 860 kg more than 1981 Chrysler Le Baron.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Chrysler Le Baron | 1963 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Chrysler | Lincoln |
Model | Le Baron | Continental |
Year Released | 1981 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3678 cc | 7048 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 284 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 2400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 5500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 3210 mm |