1981 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1964 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1981 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 3,678 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 950 kg more than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1981 Chrysler Le Baron has automatic transmission and 1964 Lotus Elan has manual transmission. 1964 Lotus Elan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Chrysler Le Baron will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Chrysler Le Baron | 1964 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
Model | Le Baron | Elan |
Year Released | 1981 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3678 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 590 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2140 mm |