1981 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, both 1981 Chrysler Le Baron and 1981 Zastava 102 were released in the same year (1981). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 3,678 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 766 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102.
Because 1981 Chrysler Le Baron is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Chrysler Le Baron. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1981 Chrysler Le Baron has automatic transmission and 1981 Zastava 102 has manual transmission. 1981 Zastava 102 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Chrysler Le Baron will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Chrysler Le Baron | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Zastava |
| Model | Le Baron | 102 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 3678 cc | 1302 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 774 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2160 mm |
