1981 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2000 Mitsubishi Magna
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi Magna is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,678 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 85 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi Magna.
Because 1981 Chrysler Le Baron is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Chrysler Le Baron. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Magna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Chrysler Le Baron | 2000 Mitsubishi Magna | |
Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
Model | Le Baron | Magna |
Year Released | 1981 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3678 cc | 2972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 188 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1455 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2730 mm |