1981 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2005 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,932 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 171 kg more than 1981 Chrysler Le Baron.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Chrysler Le Baron | 2005 Lincoln LS | |
| Make | Chrysler | Lincoln |
| Model | Le Baron | LS |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3678 cc | 3932 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 280 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1711 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2910 mm |
