1981 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2005 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2005 Toyota Matrix is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,678 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 315 kg more than 2005 Toyota Matrix.
Because 1981 Chrysler Le Baron is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Chrysler Le Baron. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Chrysler Le Baron | 2005 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | Le Baron | Matrix |
Year Released | 1981 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3678 cc | 1786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 130 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2500 mm |