1981 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,678 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1005 kg more than 1981 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Chrysler Le Baron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Chrysler Le Baron | 2008 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Chrysler | Land Rover |
Model | Le Baron | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1981 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3678 cc | 2926 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 175 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 2545 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2890 mm |