1981 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2010 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac STS is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,678 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac STS weights approximately 262 kg more than 1981 Chrysler Le Baron.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Chrysler Le Baron | 2010 Cadillac STS | |
| Make | Chrysler | Cadillac |
| Model | Le Baron | STS |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3678 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 302 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1802 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1844 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1463 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2957 mm |
