1981 Chrysler Newport vs. 2000 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Chrysler Newport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Chrysler Newport would be higher. At 5,210 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Chrysler Newport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Chrysler Newport (161 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2000 Ford Mustang. (130 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Chrysler Newport should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Chrysler Newport weights approximately 512 kg more than 2000 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Mustang (447 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Chrysler Newport. (364 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Chrysler Newport.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Chrysler Newport | 2000 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Newport | Mustang |
Year Released | 1981 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5210 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 364 Nm | 447 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1810 kg | 1298 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5600 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2580 mm |