1981 Citroen CX vs. 2009 Dodge Durango
To start off, 2009 Dodge Durango is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Citroen CX would be higher. At 5,652 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Durango (345 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 240 more horse power than 1981 Citroen CX. (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Durango should accelerate faster than 1981 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Durango weights approximately 466 kg more than 1981 Citroen CX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Citroen CX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Durango (515 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 363 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Citroen CX. (152 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Citroen CX | 2009 Dodge Durango | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | CX | Durango |
Year Released | 1981 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 5652 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 345 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 515 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1691 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.2 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 102 L |