1981 Citroen CX vs. 2009 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Citroen CX would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (189 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1981 Citroen CX. (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1981 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 195 kg more than 1981 Citroen CX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (220 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Citroen CX. (152 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Citroen CX | 2009 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | CX | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 189 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 78.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.5 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.2 L/100km | 10.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 61 L |