1981 Citroen GSA vs. 1980 Zastava 2101
To start off, 1981 Citroen GSA is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 1,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Zastava 2101 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Zastava 2101 (62 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1981 Citroen GSA. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Zastava 2101 should accelerate faster than 1981 Citroen GSA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Zastava 2101 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1981 Citroen GSA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Zastava 2101 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Zastava 2101. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Citroen GSA, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Citroen GSA | 1980 Zastava 2101 | |
| Make | Citroen | Zastava |
| Model | GSA | 2101 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1980 |
| Engine Size | 1129 cc | 1198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 56 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2430 mm |
