1981 Citroen GSA vs. 1982 Volvo 240
To start off, 1982 Volvo 240 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Citroen GSA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Citroen GSA would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Volvo 240 (106 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1981 Citroen GSA. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Volvo 240 should accelerate faster than 1981 Citroen GSA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Volvo 240 weights approximately 360 kg more than 1981 Citroen GSA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Citroen GSA, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Citroen GSA | 1982 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | GSA | 240 |
Year Released | 1981 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1129 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2660 mm |