1981 Citroen GSA vs. 2005 Mazda Marathon
To start off, 2005 Mazda Marathon is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Citroen GSA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Citroen GSA would be higher. At 2,260 cc, 2005 Mazda Marathon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda Marathon (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1981 Citroen GSA. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Marathon should accelerate faster than 1981 Citroen GSA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda Marathon weights approximately 587 kg more than 1981 Citroen GSA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Mazda Marathon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mazda Marathon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Citroen GSA, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Citroen GSA | 2005 Mazda Marathon | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | GSA | Marathon |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 1129 cc | 2260 cc |
| Horse Power | 56 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 10 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1517 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 76 L |
