1981 Citroen GSA vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Citroen GSA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Citroen GSA would be higher. At 2,489 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1981 Citroen GSA. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1981 Citroen GSA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 25 kg more than 1981 Citroen GSA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Citroen GSA | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | GSA | 6 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1129 cc | 2489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 70 L |