1981 Citroen LN vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1981 Citroen LN is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,453 cc, 1960 Toyota Master RR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Toyota Master RR (40 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1981 Citroen LN. (35 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Toyota Master RR should accelerate faster than 1981 Citroen LN. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 500 kg more than 1981 Citroen LN. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Citroen LN, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Citroen LN | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Citroen | Toyota |
| Model | LN | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 652 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 75 L |
