1981 Citroen Mehari vs. 1968 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1981 Citroen Mehari is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (335 HP) has 306 more horse power than 1981 Citroen Mehari. (29 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1981 Citroen Mehari.
Because 1968 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Citroen Mehari, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford Mustang (597 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 558 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Citroen Mehari. (39 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1968 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Citroen Mehari.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Citroen Mehari | 1968 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | Mehari | Mustang |
Year Released | 1981 | 1968 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 7010 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 29 HP | 335 HP |
Torque | 39 Nm | 597 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2750 mm |