1981 Daihatsu Charmant vs. 2010 Mazda 3

To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Daihatsu Charmant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Daihatsu Charmant would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1981 Daihatsu Charmant. (67 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1981 Daihatsu Charmant.

Because 1981 Daihatsu Charmant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Daihatsu Charmant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 3 (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Daihatsu Charmant. (103 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Daihatsu Charmant.

Compare all specifications:

1981 Daihatsu Charmant 2010 Mazda 3
Make Daihatsu Mazda
Model Charmant 3
Year Released 1981 2010
Body Type Station Wagon Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1290 cc 2184 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 67 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 3500 RPM
Torque 103 Nm 360 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 1800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual 5-speed manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4100 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Width 1530 mm 1755 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1471 mm
Wheelbase Size 2340 mm 2639 mm