1981 Daihatsu Taft vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1981 Daihatsu Taft is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1981 Daihatsu Taft. (44 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1981 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Daihatsu Taft weights approximately 590 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan.
Because 1981 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Daihatsu Taft | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Lotus |
| Model | Taft | Elan |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 958 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 430 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3370 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2240 mm |
